The Conquering of Canada: Mass Migration Mayhem

Trudeau's mass migration policies are unsustainable and driving rampant crime, unaffordable housing, and failing healthcare.

“We’re always going to need and benefit from tremendous immigration,” Justin Trudeau announced in an impressively condescending tone. According to our woke overlord, THE most important responsibility that our federal government has is to “make sure Canadians remain strong, positive, and confident about immigration.”

While Trudeau talks about positivity and confidence, his PR strategy seems to involve labeling anyone who opposes his immigration policies as bigoted, xenophobic, or racist. This makes sense considering the lack of positive outcomes from these policies.

In 2023, Canada’s population growth accelerated to 3.2%, a rate rivalled only by African nations. The country’s population increased by 1.25 million last year, the largest in any 12-month period since Canada’s creation in 1867, according to Statistics Canada.

Over this period, Canada took in 454,590 new permanent residents and 804,690 non-permanent residents. This excludes the roughly 2.2 million temporary workers, international students, or asylum claimants currently in the country.

This is unsustainable.

Anyone who hasn’t deluded themselves with ‘woke’ ideology can see the effects of mass migration. Crime is rampant, housing is unaffordable, healthcare is imploding, wages are stagnating, young Canadians can’t find summer jobs, and the largest contributor to all of these problems are Trudeau’s immigration policies, which are only set to increase.

Many claim these policies are about buying votes, yet the majority of Canadians oppose them. So, if these policies contribute to the Liberal party’s decline, why continue them?

The truth is that mass migration isn't about compassion for foreigners or buying votes. It aims to fund the State, create cultural divide, and hide the grim economic landscape. Let’s explore these reasons one by one.

Funding the State

Government programs are a pyramid scheme based on age. For them to work, there needs to be more young people at the bottom paying into social programs than old people at the top withdrawing from them. It’s simple math. A program or business with higher costs than revenue will fail.

After World War II, Western societies experienced a “baby boom.” In the early 1960s, there were roughly 4 children born per woman. Just a decade later, after contraception, abortion, and women entering the workforce became widespread, the birth rate plummeted to below 2 children per woman, inverting the age pyramid.

Today, those ‘baby boomers’ are starting to withdraw their pensions and move into assisted living. According to the most recent report by the Office of the Chief Actuary, the CPP is financially sustainable for at least 75 years. Although that’s only true if those leaving the workforce are replaced by new taxpayers.

If you mention ‘The Great Replacement,’ you are likely to be labeled a conspiracy theorist or worse; a white supremacist. Although, these labels aren’t unfounded. There is a growing swath of white nationalists who are coming out of the woodworks to play the identity politics game that the left started back up decades ago. Academics and Marxist ideologues made white supremacy into a boogeyman, claiming it was to blame for all inequalities. Concepts that have been labeled racist include but are not limited to: mathematics, punctuality, credit scores, the climate, Apu from the Simpsons, Star Wars, bulletproof glass, tanning, borders, science, crime statistics, patriotism, car insurance, verbal articulation, and just about anything else you can think of. A fun experiment is Googling “___ is racist'' and realizing that according to the Left everything is racist, even chicken and waffles flavoured potato chips.

While the Left and the Right argue over race ‘replacement,’ they both miss the big picture; economic replacement. The main goal of mass migration is to fund the State. To avoid sounding like a ‘conspiracy theorist,’ a term that is slowly becoming a badge of honour rather than a pejorative, here’s a 177-page report from the United Nations titled ‘Replacement Migration,’ where the international bureaucracy lays out why mass migration is necessary and how to facilitate it.

While Occam's Razor would have us believe that mass migration was implemented mainly for economic reasons, that doesn’t mean the cultural implications of this policy can’t be used to benefit the State further. These consequences are not likely to upset the Left, who openly seek to obliterate any ‘social construct’ they claim is the product of ‘whiteness.’

Divide and Conquer

Canada’s first Prime Minister of Colour, Justin Trudeau, once declared that the nation has no ‘core identity’ or ‘mainstream’ culture.

While some may disagree, the reason that the validity of his statements can be debated is largely due to his father.

Canada became the first country in the world to introduce a multiculturalism policy in 1971 under Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau’s government. This policy marked a significant shift in Canada’s cultural framework. While claiming the goal was to preserve and enhance cultural heritage, it actually did the opposite.

After this policy was implemented the country started accommodating foreign cultures, rather than assimilating them. Instead of creating programs to ensure that those who moved here would respect our way of life, the Government began funding ‘cultural groups’ and organizations aimed to preserve and promote the heritage of immigrants.

All of these policies stem from a concept known as ‘cultural relativism,’ which proclaims there is no universal standard to measure cultures by, and that the values and beliefs of one culture cannot be measured against the values and beliefs of another. This is obviously a nonsensical notion and would be easily debunked by asking any proponent of cultural relativism their thoughts on Nazi culture. They’d rightfully denounce Nazi culture without hesitation, despite not being from that culture, showing that their relativist stance towards culture is only selectively applied.

The unpopular truth is; some cultures are better than others. Admitting that does not make you a racist. Culture is defined as, “the arts, beliefs, customs, institutions, and other products of human work and thought considered as a unit, especially with regard to a particular time or social group.” None of this has to do with someone’s skin colour. Many different races can cooperate under a single culture, however, the same race will face conflict in the presence of multiple cultures. This is a benefit for those who can use divide and conquer strategies amongst the population they rule over.

Let’s say I was at the helm of an authoritarian government that believed freedom of speech is a nuisance but the dominant culture greatly valued it. I’d tell LGBTQ folk that we’re enacting compelled speech laws to protect their identity, I’d tell the Islamic community that we’re passing hate speech laws to ensure no one can slander their prophet, and I’d tell parents we’re censoring the internet to protect their children. I’d divide the nation into as many competing groups as possible, promising each of them protection from the other, in order to seize the power needed to subjugate all of them.

Consider another scenario. Let’s say my regime despised the right to privacy and wanted to create an ever-expansive surveillance state. I could import one culture, which is fundamentally opposed to the current dominant culture, leading to an inevitable clash between them, and when this occurs I could market totalitarian measures as an antidote to social unrest. I could create an atmosphere where everyday citizens would welcome infringements on their most important rights to quell the chaos.

Note: I’m aware this is the UK, however, their today is our tomorrow as we implement the same policies which led to this scenario.

Collaboration with Crime

Since Trudeau took office in 2015, violent crime has increased nearly 50%, according to Stats Canada. International gangs are exploiting Canada’s lax immigration and bail policies. Something that our current immigration minister, Marc Miller, claims is ‘inevitable.’

While most are only aware of the surface level problems, such as an increase of 45% in auto thefts, almost all of which end up getting shipped back overseas to the perpetrators country of origin, the depths of this problem are much more terrifying. 

As extensively reported by Sam Cooper, Chinese Communist Party backed criminal organizations treat Canada like their playground. Organized crime syndicates are laundering their illegal funds through Government operated casinos and parking their profits in Canadian real estate, contributing to the housing crisis. These funds are then used to undermine Canadian elections, compromise politicians, and takeover industry. 

The point here is not that crime is a product of Chinese culture—that would be ridiculous—but that these criminals from other cultures and backgrounds weaponize the labels of racism against us. Corporate outlets and journalists won’t dare ask if international crime rings are using diaspora communities within our borders as cover for crime, afraid of being labeled racist or having these organizations pull funding.

It would be fair to ask: how does any of this possibly benefit those who are creating the immigration policies? Well, as noted, these organizations manipulate our elections. They successfully nudged the 2019 and 2021 elections in favour of our ruling coalition, the Liberals and NDP, who are both in favour of more immigration and looser crime laws.

It is not hard to see an incentive structure here. Politicians create a favourable environment for criminal activity, those criminals use government casinos to launder money, effectively funding the State, then use their profits to help those politicians get re-elected. Both the politicians and criminals label anyone who notices this scheme a racist, using our attitudes toward multiculturalism against us.

Immigration and ‘diversity’ allow the State to work hand in hand with criminal organizations from other cultures, accomplishing what they could not with a homogenized population, as they can socially tar anyone who notices with the label ‘racist.’

Economic Gaslighting

The Liberal immigration policies have acted as a smokescreen, hiding Canada’s grim economic landscape. Recently, Justin Trudeau’s lackeys, including Chrystia Freeland, Steven Guilbeault, and other MPs, tweeted a forecast by the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

While this group of (alleged) Pathocrats tries to rub this report in the faces of the opposition, it only highlights that the Trudeau camp is either economically illiterate or manipulating the public at a scale which would make Machiavelli proud. What they won’t tell you is that the only reason Canada’s economy is growing is mass migration. While some might argue that a growing economy is a good thing, we need to make a distinction between overall and per capita GDP growth.

Consider this example: If you have a house with 10 people, each making $10,000 annually, the GDP for that house would be $100,000. If you add 10 more people to that house, and everyone now makes $7,500 annually, the GDP for that house would be $150,000. It’s 50% higher than with 10 people, despite everyone making 25% less.

Arbitrary numbers aside, this is precisely what is happening in Canada. We’re importing people at a rate that makes it seem like our economy is growing, but wages are stagnating, productivity is plummeting, and prices are skyrocketing. By endlessly printing money and importing an unsustainable number of consumers, the State has artificially boosted demand while supply crashes, creating an economic time bomb. It’s not a matter of if, but when this bomb will detonate.

This is basic level economics. You cannot have an expanding State, which is a non-productive entity that survives only by extracting wealth from productive entities, while the private sector shrinks or stagnates. The State is an economic parasite draining its host (citizens) of too many resources, leading to a slow death of both entities. This process has already begun. According to the Fraser Institute, the average Canadian now spends more on taxes than on shelter, food, and clothing combined.

The Bumpy Road Ahead

There are two policies causing most of Canada’s problems: out-of-control government spending and mass migration. There is a road that Canada can take, which will be bumpy but doesn’t lead to a cliff.

The nation needs to surgically remove the economic tumour known as the State. The social experiment of Canada has failed. Universal healthcare, welfare programs, and pensions are sinking. It’s now a matter of whether the Canadian people want to financially drown while hanging onto these economic anchors or let go and slowly begin the ascent to a much needed breath of air.

The newly elected President of Argentina, Javier Milei, has already proved that “chainsawing” the State can reverse these trends. Milei’s austerity measures led to Argentina’s first budget surplus in 16 years and reduced monthly inflation rates from around 25% in December to 4.2% in May.

This doesn’t mean that the drastic measures Milei has taken don’t have consequences of their own. There have been short-term hardships, including reduced salaries and pensions. However, here’s how this economic time bomb works:

We can add more time to the detonation clock through government spending, but there’s a catch: every time we print money, we have to add a stick of dynamite. There is no Hollywood option where we get to cut a wire and avoid the explosion. If we continue on the same trajectory, eventually we run out of dynamite, leading to a scenario resembling Weimar Germany, where money itself becomes as valuable as a child’s toy.

Again, this problem is avoidable but only if Canadians muster the courage to change their stance towards mass migration and stop entrusting the State, a criminal enterprise, to fix their problems.